No. 20-6243

Okeiba Sadio v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights covered-offense criminal-procedure drug-distribution due-process first-step-act sentencing sentencing-reduction sixth-amendment statutory-penalties
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Wrongly dismiss Mr Sadio's Appeal with out no Briefs being filed or hearing any arguments, violating mr. Sadio's Constitutional right for due process, When Clearly in fact and in LAw mr sadio is eligible for the. first step Act, and should be resentenced for his Cavered offense"

(2) Thiere is a need for the United States Supreme Cort to resolvie the Conflict amongst the District and Appellate courts to Provide guidance as to what mates a person eligible for the first step Act.

(3) Whether the Second Circuit Caurt of Appeals Violated Petitioner Mrsadio's Sixth Amendment Constitutional Right to Consel legal representation, If Petitioner Cauldn't afford legal representation one Should be Provided.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing Mr. Sadio's constitutional right to due process, when clearly Mr. Sadio is eligible for the First Step Act, and should be resentenced for his covered offense

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Okeiba Sadia
Okeiba Sadio — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent