No. 20-6233

Krishna Mote v. James W. Murtin, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech standing
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) Where as if a Civil Action is not connected to the criminal Action, should the Civil Action be dismissed without Prejudice or dismissed under the Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine, because of a criminal matter without determining the merits of the Civil Action?

(2) Where as if the District Court dismiss an Civil Action without Prejudice, Can the District Court reopen the Civil Action and Dismiss the Civil action witout considering the merits of the Civil Action?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their First Amendment rights

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Krishna Mote
Krishna Mote — Petitioner