Gregory C. Raymore v. United States
A. Whether Petitioner's conviction must be vacated because (1) the indictment failed to alleg e an essential element of the offense–that Petitioner knew he belong ed to the relevant categ ory of persons barred from possessing a firearm, (2) the government failed to present evidence at trial that Petitioner knew he belong ed to the relevant categ ory of persons barred from possessing a firearm, and (3) the jury was instructed that it need not find Petitioner knew he belong ed to the relevant categ ory of persons barred from possessing a firearm, all in violation of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019).
B. Whether Petitioner's convictions for ag gravated robbery under Ohio Rev. Code Section 2911.01(A)(1) and assault under Ohio Rev. Code Section 2903.13(A) are categ orically not crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B 1.2.
Whether Petitioner's conviction must be vacated due to Rehaif violation