No. 20-6197

Gregory C. Raymore v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-law due-process firearms indictment jury-instructions mens-rea
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

A. Whether Petitioner's conviction must be vacated because (1) the indictment failed to alleg e an essential element of the offense–that Petitioner knew he belong ed to the relevant categ ory of persons barred from possessing a firearm, (2) the government failed to present evidence at trial that Petitioner knew he belong ed to the relevant categ ory of persons barred from possessing a firearm, and (3) the jury was instructed that it need not find Petitioner knew he belong ed to the relevant categ ory of persons barred from possessing a firearm, all in violation of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019).

B. Whether Petitioner's convictions for ag gravated robbery under Ohio Rev. Code Section 2911.01(A)(1) and assault under Ohio Rev. Code Section 2903.13(A) are categ orically not crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B 1.2.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner's conviction must be vacated due to Rehaif violation

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-04
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 4, 2021.
2020-11-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 3, 2020 to January 4, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2020)

Attorneys

Gregory Raymore
Matthew McGavock RobinsonRobinson & Brandt, PSC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent