1. Whether, in holding that a private citizen can lawfully search and seize the digital contents of a cell phone without a warrant, the state supreme court decision directly conflicts with this Court's decisions in Riley and Carpenter.

2. Whether the state supreme court's denial of the petition for writ of mandamus was arbitrary and capricious.

Whether the warrantless search and seizure of a cell phone's digital contents and location information by a private citizen debt collector violates the Fourth Amendment