No. 20-6183
Timothy N. Hatton v. Mark R. Sevier, Superintendent, New Castle Correctional Facility
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment standing
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the State violate Hatton's U.S. Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and speedy trial?
Did the state violate Hatton's U.S. Fifth Amendment right to Due Process by denying evidentiary hearings, the collection of attorney-client files, interrogatories, and the means to collect evidence?
Did counsel coerce and mislead Hatton into an involuntary plea agreement?
Should Hatton's Habeas Corpus have been dismissed and is he within the one year statute of limitations?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-02
Waiver of right of respondent Sevier, Supt., New Castle to respond filed.
2020-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Sevier, Supt., New Castle
Stephen Richard Creason — Respondent
Timothy N. Hatton
Timothy N. Hatton — Petitioner