1. Did the Court of Appeals correctly apply the interest of justice standard into the Petitioner's substitution of counsel claim where the trial facts into the circumstances underlying the

2. Did the Petitioner knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel nine days after discharging appointed counsel?

Did the Court of Appeals correctly apply the 'interests of justice' standard to the Petitioner's substitution of counsel claim where the trial court made no inquiry to gather information regarding the circumstances underlying the request, where the Petitioner proceeded pro se and asserted his right to counsel only days after a conviction