No. 20-6173

In Re Tommie H. Telfair

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-10-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment standing
Latest Conference: 2020-11-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. WHETHER CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND FUNDAMENTAL ERRORS AS A "SOURCE" OF "
CONSTITUTIONAL INFRINGEMENT DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF THE 1ST, 5TH, 6TH, 13TH,
and 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION?

II. WHETHER PETITIONER OR THE GOVERNMENT'S AGENT(S) VIOLATED THE GENERAL
CONSPIRACY STATUTES TANTAMOUNT TO EX POST FACTO LAWS; AND THE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION OF THE STATUTORY ELEMENTS UNDER 18 U.S.C. §2,
21 U.S.C. §$841, 846?

IIL. WHETHER CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND FUNDAMENTAL ERRORS AS A "SOURCE" OF ;
CONSTITUTIONAL INFRINGEMENT LED TO THE MISAPPLICATION OF 18 U.S.C. §2, 21
U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 CREATING SERIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL SEPARATION-OF -POWER
CONCERNS WHICH ATTACH TO PETITIONER'S SENTENCE ABOVE THE. STATUTORY MAXIMUM

: PENALTY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process and equal protection clauses

Docket Entries

2020-11-23
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2020-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-23
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Tommie H. Telfair
Tommie H. Telfair — Petitioner