No. 20-6170
Justin David Brown v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law agency-action constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review sentencing sixth-amendment standing statutory-interpretation substantial-assistance
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the defendants Sixth Distnet Court violate the Amendment right Special Agent Nicole allowing ba Bailey Hecring the defendants Sentancing 4s2 24 at thereby Uiolation unrensonable sentance in impos 8 2 S53? of 18 US.C. 2
Did the distric Court err by not holding a 5K1.1 bused on the hearing to detendants
Question Presented (AI Summary)
did-the-court-err-by-not-holding-a-hearing
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Justin David Brown
Justin David Brown — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent