No. 20-6163

Angelique Bankston v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence grand-jury ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement material-omissions professional-misconduct sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

If the jury was presented with severe witness and evidence and witness presented where (Xanks-twls) Was no+ clowned -he in violcch'on - l-f "dhie (ooVerot^eo^Tahriooie pr&hdble Caus-c and made, material omi-SS/ons in the &v)br-tXT Q-H'ida.Vit' Woaldn '-hd^iat: Violtct-c /Sanksisn's)dearly e-SdablWhed pWr+n fhmeramen-h (do A S+i diction ? -failed do do any -predr iai iovesdig ah on inbv ari'j -evidene-e-or Any Witnesses Who possessed k-ntW l-edae Ponc-eroipQ lXnksh>n ^ailt" or innodence,. VJduldn'-j- '-fb<zt -fall beiod pretall/nj -protessionat norms and Wol<xte(iXdbh)/)d) 2)1 xiX am mend" da eftech/g OSSiSdance o-h Counsel?rnsi

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government fabricated probable cause and made material omissions in the affidavit, violating the Fourth Amendment

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Angelique Bankston
Angelique Bankston — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent