No. 20-616

Stephen Durr v. Department of the Army, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2020-11-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-interpretation motion-to-vacate procedural-rights standing statute-claim statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did The U.S. District Court (Washington, DC), Abuse The U.S. Court Of Appeals (Washington DC) Abuse Discretion In The Denial Of The Petitioner Motion Fee Vacation Of Judgment, Petitioner Amend The Statute Claim Appeal Denied, Also The Petitioner Supplement Judgment On Motion To Vacate Judgment (Appendices A-E) Under FRCP 60(b)?

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-08
Supplemental brief of petitioner Stephen Durr filed. (Distributed)
Main Document
2020-12-07
Waiver of right of respondents Department of the Army, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 9, 2020)
PetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Department of the Army, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Stephen Durr
Stephen Durr — Petitioner