No. 20-6157

Pedro Hernandez v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process motion-to-dismiss prejudicial-error sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the district court prejudicially err denying petitioner's motion to dismiss based on Sixth Amendment violations?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the district court prejudicially err denying petitioner's motion to dismiss based on Sixth Amendment violations?

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Pedro Hernandez
Karren Kenney — Kenney Legal Defense, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent