No. 20-6145
Anthony Quentin Kelly v. Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Warden, et al.
IFP
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
In the extrcordinary ircunstances of this case, lenited states Lourt of Appeals
Daniet, 529 4.s, 473, 48y (2000); B4ck 05 Davi5, - 4.5.m,137 80k 759,773-74
the same important matter.
iwited sfates Lourt of Appesl for the Nive lirenit har decided an inportant
stion of federad law that hes not beer, but should be, seftled by this Lourt
that Concts with relwaN
decisiopr of fhis lour.
i
fowrth lircuit clearly abuse its authority
withiont writin g an explanation of
ow Fourth Cireuit rewehed if July 12, 2o2o, Saptenber 8, Loo & Septerber 12,202D
deciSions
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in its decision regarding federal law
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Anthony Kelly
Anthony Quintin Kelly — Petitioner