No. 20-6127
Jermaine Antwan Tart v. Jamese Vigus, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights disciplinary-hearing discovery-violation due-process evidence-suppression housing judicial-procedure pleadings summary-judgment video-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
ANX OFFICIAL RULING ON ONE OF THE DUE PROCESS CLAIMS, CLEARLY AND CONCISELY PRESENTED A DUE PROCESS CLAIM . WHICH HAPPENRD DIRECTLY AFTER THE FIRST DUE PROCESS MY DISCIPLNARY HEARNG. THE CLAIM WAS THAT MARK TROCK AND MS. VIGUS SENT ME TO MODIFIED HOUSING WITHOUT GIVING ME AN FCC NOR OF DUE PROCESS. I PRESENTED THE RULE BOOK, DISCOVERED PAPERS AND OTHER DOCUANENTS TO SUPPORT NNY PLEA JUDGE JAMES C BE DEVER DIDN'T GIVE A RULENG ON THAT. ITS A WHOLE'DUE PROCESS SCENALIO AND IT WENT UNADJUCATED. I REQUEST CERTIORARY
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How can the case be closed without any decision on one of the due process claims?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2020)
Attorneys
Jermaine Antwan Tart
Jermaine Tart — Petitioner