My Sentence of LIFE imprisonment was imposed without the trial court addressing my non-frivolous argument for a lower sentence. On appeal, the Court of Appeals concurred with appointed counsel's assessment that the appeal presented no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review. The court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and dismissed my appeal whether I sufficiently preserved the "particular" substantive reasonableness argument, that the Guideline LIFE sentence is unreasonable.

Whether I Sufficiently Preserved the Particular Substantive-reasonableness argument, that the Guideline LIFE sentence is unreasonable.

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion when it granted appointed counsel's motion to withdraw and dismissed the petitioner's appeal, holding that the appeal presented no non-frivolous issues for appellate review