No. 20-6119

In Re Nira Woods

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion amendment-violation civil-rights constitutional-rights court-reporter due-process equal-protection judicial-recusal recusal standing superior-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Three Orders by three Judges, at three different Superior Court branches in California, without hearing Petitioner (on 09/28/20, 09/30/20, 10/30/20), agree/believe that preserving the employment status of an assigned Court Reporter, over the Petitioner 's Constitutional Rights "would farther the interest of justice "; and therefore ruled/ordered: "The [Superior] Court recuses itself on this case ". [Bold Highlight] And without Qualification, in bias, in abuse of discretion, threw Petitioner out from entire Superior Court of California : the Court Reporter is defendant (20) in Petitioner 's Superior Court Case: 20TRCV00564;

Question 1:
Were Petitioner 's Constitutional Rights violated (including the 1st, 5th, and 14th Amendment(s))?

Question 2:
"The [Superior] Court recuses itself on this case ", while not transferring/reassign the case to the California Federal Court, is in violation of Petitioner 's Constitutional Rights?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were Petitioner's Constitutional Rights violated (including the 15+, 5th, and 14th Amendment(s))

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-03
Third Supplemental brief of petitioner Nira Woods filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-30
Second Supplemental brief of petitioner Nira Woods filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-19
Supplemental brief of petitioner Nira Woods filed.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Nira Woods
Nira Woods — Petitioner