No. 20-611

Robert J. Doyle v. Jacqueline M. Vigilante

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: access-to-courts appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-violation due-process judicial-procedure procedural-due-process right-to-sue
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether or not the Right to Sue, Right to Access Courts to Be Heard, and Procedural Due Process Rights in the US Constitution require that a Court of Appeals, upon issuing a written opinion, address and resolve every issue raised and necessary to a final disposition of the appeal?

Whether or not the Third Circuit Court of Appeals violated Petitioner's due process rights, right to sue, and right of access to the courts by dismissing his appeal without addressing his primary claim of error which was necessary to the adjudication of the appeal?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the right to sue, right of access to courts, and procedural due process require a court of appeals to address and resolve every issue raised on appeal?

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-07
Brief of respondent Jacqueline Vigilante in opposition filed.
2020-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Jacqueline Vigilante
Patricia Fecile-MorelandMarks O'Neill O'Brien Doherty and Kelly, Respondent
Robert J. Doyle, Jr.
Alfred Joseph FluehrFrancis Alexander LLC, Petitioner