No. 20-6101
Rachel Mae Skidmore v. United States
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment sixth-amendment statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(1) comports with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. 3§583(g)(1) comports with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments?
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Rachel Mae Skidmore
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent