1: May the District court compell related Issues to be severed and indrvldually flled so as to dismiss the resulting actlons indirldnaly and deprive such citrzen of appellate Process under the P.L.R.A.?

2: Does the P.L.RA. Opperate to bar appeals of actons propriety from being opealed?

3: Showd a citizen ever be deprlved of revlew of criminal nature, iwlthout ever looking into the facts asserted in such petition (s?

4: Can a District court dismiss a pleading as frivelons, betore servrce on any detendanty based on a finding that the plendings assert wride spread miscarriges of justice in state court proceding so

5 Does the District cohrt enjoy spedal absolute to petiton the courts via the P.l. ReA.?

6 Does the P.leRt. violate egucl protecton clanse to suspect class of ipriseners?

7 What IF any, time lImlts affect the courts for redress of jerceved injury.

8: Does the PE Strcte under the P.L.R.A permit such District judge to exploit the proveslons there under so as to afflict the petitloner to a wrong third strrke which the petitoner is helpless to have resolved?

giwhen a citrzen flles a new actlon in Rederal court asserting that multiple isshes in prevlous fiings formerly dismssed for"Fallare state a claim" were in fact subjected to further actions which establish the actions there under to have been asserted were as alledged that wrengful cnd injury resalted directly and consegnentially, as wrel as incidentally from those such is the court free to dismiss such assertlons as frivelons and unappeaable va the P.LR.A.

10:Is it the practice of this nation's present government to turn a blind eye to other government actors' corruption, in vlolation of 14t Amendment sectons?And conciderably Trecson)

1: welther or not unrensonably severed elements of one case [as elgble under FR.Civ. P.18 and 207 reasorably constitute multiple stirikes agalnst the PAA

2welther this distrct court is empowered submitted actlen seeking orgina jurcsdiction.

1iDoes compliance with directions of any offictals directions reasonasly allol a court court to use shch pro-se petitloner to be subject to further"strkes against P.LRet limits

14: Does Fed. R.Civ.P. 19 regulre a cenrt to join any dentitiable party responsible when a pro-se pettloner asserts an evident violation of a law or constituffonal protectlon, or is it. excused in dismissing the action as frivelong Dr failare to state a clalim"so as to arctas a strrke agaist P.lRA. reasonable despite Even it the court only acknowledges the wrongtol

for clrculatig information abont its falsly obtained conviction of aggravated baftery in the L0o6-CF-3q case,would +his Brotherhood "the order of police whom are the exclusive comunicattons: recplents of such wouldn't this alone bea substantial issue the state of zrlinois permitting all against other issues agaln

Issues being raised