No. 20-6074

Timothy Jarred Paige v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-charge criminal-procedure district-court-jurisdiction due-process plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHEN CHARGED WITH VIOLATING 18.U.S.C § 922(9)(1) COUPLED WITH § 924(a)(2) DOES THE DISTRICT COURT RETAIN JURISDICTION TO CHARGE AN OFFENSE THAT ISN'T COGNIZABLE UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES BY OMITTING AN REQUIRED ELEMENT.?

CHARGED WITH VIOLATING 18. U.S.C § 922(g)(1) WHEN COUPLED WITH § 924(A)(2), IF YOU WEREN'T GIVEN TRUE NOTICE OF THE MENS REA IS THAT AN FAIR and "JUST" REASON UNDER F.ED. R CRIM.P. 11(D)(2)(B) FOR GUILTY PLEA AGREEMENTS TO BE WITHDRAWN, TO AN CONSTITUTIONALLY "INVALID" PLEA AGREEMENT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), does the district court retain jurisdiction to charge an offense that is not a 'crime of violence' as required under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)?

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-12-21
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 21, 2020.
2020-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 19, 2020 to December 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2020)

Attorneys

Timothy Paige
Timothy Paige — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent