No. 20-6072

Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino v. J. Espinosa, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fees garnishment state-law
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Goes iUe, °
Cirusrn'/e^j jfc oton sia-fe c^&f n>
0ve/ -hsd)cc OjZsnj?
3 l)oU>e ^ b/ sVa-krv» s

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the state of California have the right to circumvent its own state garnishment laws to impose the garnishment charge of $35 over the $10 fee presented by state law?

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Dorothy Maraglino
Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino — Petitioner