No. 20-6059
Paul Edward Duran v. Kathleen Allison, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review arbitration-award civil-rights constitutional-violations district-court due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-arbitration-act federal-court habeas-corpus judicial-discretion motion-to-vacate
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court err by not issuing a COA, when the Court had knowledge that there were allegations of constitutional violations that were not refuted with facts in a proper evidentiary hearing in state or federal court?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent Kathleen Allison to respond filed.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Kathleen Allison
Taylor Thuy Nguyen — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Paul Edward Duran
Paul Edward Duran — Petitioner