1. Should certiorari be granted where venue was laid in the
Southern District of New York, even though no elements of the crime
occurred there, including enticement?

2. Should certiorari be granted because a jury cannot be deemed
to have disregarded a court's admonition not to consider what even the
District Court conceded was a mistakenly admitted admission of guilt?

3. Should certiorari be granted because the government placed
Petitioner's character in issue, in its case-in-chief, by eliciting from
Darryn Denver that he had a reputation as a "swindler,' to prove he
acted in conformity with that trait?

Should venue be proper where no elements of the crime occurred?