Charlie Bell Bullock v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
1 -Do ^c, +W CW5t^
VV\Oy4^ CKV/CAl" 1 <\\y £ 0 ^
AV 5 Oy'b yv\v +'h-e<\ <k WcK > S Co^ Viclm
Cross ■eAa^v\«ivo\N \ 4 6-C
va.m\S.-€.| i Vs. -t. -e_<_-V v m -£ ^o-f VNO"V oVj^c^'vscj
£.VJkC,V Cv.'w OtCui<T£v\<L^ ^•o
*X- Do« S» f V»-^ j? x--e\fou V\ a<^ pv-o-^CS^ioVAc^N
0\Hovwey -fo J< wow Hre CovrfcV ,£-fc,v\4cHv4 ©-£V\0 V V'Wok +*;*\
, ••? >r -e.\j\ -^.\j\i \
^ Po-e $ "VV e
oy-H'ow'-ey "h«) ^pr^c^Ov'vNcj p < 0_C e55ioAiA^ V\c<^ T
+Vi-e -6. \-e. W\-e v\ o w
N* d^v\ ONW o.Ho'f^y's Cvavwmv ><xVvq -e-orors W W^ ec4isf^ <xsS('s-Kawc£
£<*cV.^ ^ror, Vy i-H-ei4 vjc?s» y\o-V.f
Does the Confrontation Clause require a victim to be made available for cross-examination if pictures of them are submitted, and is counsel ineffective for not objecting to such an occurrence?