No. 20-6038

Darius Coty Whitaker v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-procedure due-process property-rights standing takings
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does a Out of circUit case law Concluding thaHObbS ACT RobbeRy is a CRiMe oF Vilence attepted UNdeR 924(elemeNt clause CoNtRol the OpeN QuestioN iN the fourth ciRcuit, oR does a out of ciRcut case lOW coNcluding that attempted Hobbs Act Robbely is Not a cRim Of Violence Undek 24Ce) Control the opew Question in the FOurth CiRcUit?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from requiring a property owner to provide public access to private property without just compensation

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 15, 2021.
2020-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2020 to January 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2020.
2020-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2020 to December 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Darius Coty Whitaker
Darius Coty Whitaker — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent