J6 U)MM the. United Zhitf Court erf appeals , c/|ecu it teas to to
denying feiito nee Access -h the court and kis
dny vmotronS tfjQmsf Suck decision Conph 'cts to iHt fUe decisions
of <j II other State g.n d ~fe dera ( Courts t a ^ J l/fo Ivies Peijltoneir's
fi rsi cza l fourteenth fliMe-ndii^ent Sights i of recess to the
rijhfr, to tbe
ffofo Consbjvf/ov ' 7otvlfy W^'u-j Petit met {row, -fcde^l Courtjkf io 'fileICl
CeuriS/ doe process <la i ffuaf protection

United
lie LoUetUer fUe- United States Court of appeals, dreu,t t Jel/lendely
and mopp^o pm-fely applied tUi Prison iiti^qteon jtef, CVH Act's
( PLRA ) three steifrts provision to P'e-'il tiOfj (?e'S (e<yq! iMq/practice
cUn^ aq«lliSt U i S former qttormeys t and to 4 case filej
Sbh Court kit Ce Moved to federal Court ky defendqnts f
decision fh-vf Conflicts D lUi all s-fote4 I n
<d federal Courts, ctn

* iohefUer fW U^iteJ Stetes CouH- of qppeqls
de.nled P-ebjioner- access to tie Covr+ by
Vi I yVn fUe opportunity to proceed- ^litvr^Q pzvperis
p*y toe required ■fih'*] fee for tUe qppeal*nr

Whether the United States Court of appeals, 7th Circuit decision denying Petitioner access to the Court and his right to file any motions against such decision conflicts with the decisions of other State and federal Courts, and violates Petitioner's First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of access to the Courts, due process and Equal protection rights, to the United States Constitution