No. 20-6029
Pedro Tiempo-Garcia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling the District Court did not err in imposing an upward departure sentence.
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the sentence imposed by the District Court was substantively reasonable.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant federal statutes and constitutional provisions
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Pedro Tiempo-Garcia
Reginald Van Wade — Reginald Van Wade, Attorney-at-Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent