No. 20-6027
Michael Moore v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: appellate-review controlled-substances criminal-law federal-sentencing gvr mens-rea rehaif-v-united-states statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Petitioner questions wehether even if §924(e)(2)(A)(ii) does not call for a generic-offense-matching analysis, does it require knowledge of the substance 's illicit nature?
2. Whether GVR is warranted in Petitiooner's case in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. (2019)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether §924(e)(2)(A)(ii) requires knowledge of the substance's illicit nature
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-10
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 10, 2021.
2021-01-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 11, 2021 to February 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 11, 2021.
2020-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2020 to January 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-10
Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2020)
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Michael Moore
Michael Moore — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent