1. WAS THE ARABIC-SPEAKING APPELLANT DENIED EFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DURING CRITICAL STAGES OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, FOR WHICH PREJUDICE IS PRESUMED, WHERE NO
INTERPRETER WAS PRESENT DURING ANY ATTORNEY-CLIENT
MEETINGS, NO INTERPRETER WAS PRESENT DURING THE
INVESTIGATORY PERIOD, AND NO INTERPRETER WAS PRESENT FOR
ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING TRIAL?

Was the Arabic-speaking appellant denied effective assistance of counsel during critical stages of the proceedings, for which prejudice is presumed, where no interpreter was present during any attorney-client meetings, no interpreter was present during the investigatory period, and no interpreter was present for any court proceedings, including trial?