I.
Did the Sixth Circuit err in denying Petitioner review of the district court's judgment in favor of Respondents on Whether there is a temporal proximity between Petitioner's protected conduct and the Sixth Amendment retaliation act of placement in medical segregation.

II.
Did the Sixth Circuit err denying Petitioner appellate review as to Whether Petitioner satisfied the Sixth Circuit third element of causation in his First Amendment retaliation claim.

III.
Did the Sixth Circuit err denying Petitioner appellate review as to Whether Petitioner is entitled to default judgment against Respondents Bernard, Combs, Jennings, and Linkous where the district court abused its discretion in dismissing petitioner's motion to reconsider the order Doc. 77 overruling petitioner's motion for default judgment.

IV.
Did the Sixth Circuit err in denying Petitioner appellate review as to Whether the District Court improperly dismissed Respondent Riegal, and manipulated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to favor the Respondents

Whether there is a temporal proximity between Petitioner's protected conduct and the Sixth Amendment retaliation act of placement in medical segregation