No. 20-6002
Curtis Lee Dale v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts adverse-decision appeals case-seizure criminal-procedure district-court due-process federal-law-enforcement pro-se procedural-due-process warrant-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does petitioner, a pro-se, a procedural due process right to "fair trial, Court and Code, at trial tactics" in the appeals court rejected by the district Court's adverse decision in this criminal matter?
Is "federal law enforcement" required to properly (to elude, cast and drugs without) and/or (to personal true security serum)?
Is federal law enforcement required to inventory and (or log personal property (to elude cast and suggest drugs without making against)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Petitioner have a procedural due process right to access the Court and file an initial brief in the appeals court related to the district court's adverse decision in his criminal matter?
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)
Attorneys
Curtis Lee Dale
Curtis Lee Dale — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent