No. 20-6001
Antranette Canady v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 3583(d)(2) civil-rights criminal-procedure liberty-deprivation probation probation-condition sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation statutory-purposes supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Is a standard condition of supervised release which requires a
person to "permit a probation officer to visit [her] at any time athome or elsewhere" too broad to comply with the directive under§ 3583(d)(2) that a condition "involve no greater deprivation ofliberty than is reasonably necessary" to further the statutorypurposes of supervised release?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a standard condition of supervised release which requires a person to 'permit a probation officer to visit [her] at any time at home or elsewhere' too broad to comply with the directive under § 3583(d)(2) that a condition 'involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary'?
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)
Attorneys
Antranette Canady
William Reynolds Biggs — WILLIAM R. BIGGS, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent