No. 20-5972

John Garrett Smith v. Ronald Hayes, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Correctional Center

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment criminal-procedure search-and-seizure standing suppression-of-evidence
Latest Conference: 2020-12-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

WrXsJkditou <*ver 3 enW«a/1) Po^ a coof^ a^ns- ^ . .
cUa^e ujluLix ^Zu>_ aroSn^-'*^ 'jv2'^*" 2 sr'(fu,'^l
<^e, <^.0OOlujuZir (ok. video looMr^
cMi^^ Pbe^frec£4d 'frtL^Ul Causes f&asft* ~k <3>or+ cfer/< 7*
\/3({<dl uyhei\ Sr+TOMe: ^j3(k
a>arr-a^ <?««fews ^ ^ ^
c^aWLi osuxkra&cis 3i( |=*ftce 3*d
^^+ £{>&> <J*S -*#*#(
M^ofes J a((' .
^flce. ^^3f=t-?HeKie; ; aui (nia)^- u>3rr^cf i.s J^^
^eel^ AFtPR. |>^toe l^ 3 M»»*xkl-fca t/
ko^is at n+3 efarfre^cL n?ee*43 T
^ ^ 3&*ss\Ue- wU vf -Is |>re4^M ^ 5 °f4
H **at%H ^ ^ * fusr^T £^r >/_ U.U.+T (Z^iAfJUt 3^c 4r.^te e^-fe
s Ke. ^ ^ ce^4^T :fe^4 ) cfc^Wk/ 3 «+.awd(
c( Ffe^^^nWi " ^ JaQicZ-fcd o*ee^(ef
veers *7 ®■Soapck L&3m2t>ct~ 5 ~s«m.<3
;oS"te■+Ka( Oov*
■tHuOvfi?
ev'
-r S 3
Jui. pKp lli\ f4\^s 0jrb^^ _fa^«^ aJhx*&Ue. ioUm. OOtKs refcfe4
'' U -(©£>1 4 AU- proWva^l **<fc=- a( r»wfls ■&^&£( —kst~
pin, 60V * A^ a ^3-L^-ft«^ai<3^® 3%ec4 (-Il'y-H-T' ««- tecordL'fe ' ^M=
<^'NfSc9- dk3v^2-ct «3ss-efe y<3n<# (^/^tLfi.
c^us-e.c.'aftve <=^'4s W vfr^/
J^? cfe j <3^'^fV "^a ( V^e.
cS^ ^vKj^JckM,e^cf~ PeOicj^L
Va^cnS)
(A>1
v>r-v-C^ 5

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a court can acquire subject matter jurisdiction over a criminal charge when the warrant used to search a smartphone is invalid because the affidavit contains false information

Docket Entries

2020-12-14
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2020)

Attorneys

John Garrett Smith
John Garrett Smith — Petitioner