I. Whether this Court should grant certiorari to determine if it was plain error for a court to impose, without explanation, a condition of supervised release that orders a defendant to abstain from consuming alcohol when neither the defendant's history nor the offense of conviction implicated that the defendant had ever abused alcohol, thus making the condition statutorily unreasonable, a violation of Due Process, and a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary.

Whether a court can impose a condition of supervised release to abstain from alcohol without explanation