1. Was trial counsel ineffective in his directive to advise McCoy to plead guilty by failing to review the government's discovery in violation of this court's decision in Andrus v. Texas, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (2020)?

2. Should the order of the court of appeals denying a certificate of appealability be reversed and remanded because it is manifestly incorrect to suggest that no reasonable jurist could disagree with a district court order summarily denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where that order directly conflicts with the controlling decisions of this Court and the plain language of § 2255?

Was trial counsel ineffective in his directive to advise McCoy to plead guilty by failing to review the government's discovery in violation of this court's decision in Andrus v. Texas, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (2020)?