1) Whether Rehaif's mens rea requirement is limited to whether or not the defendant knew he was a convicted felon alone, or whether it requires him to know that his prior felony conviction rendered him a prohibited person for subsequent firearms possession?

2) Whether the substantive constitutional rights of the defendant were violated when an indictment fails to provide notice regarding an essential element of the charged offense and the jury is subsequently given incorrect instructions regarding the Government's burden of proof?

Whether Rehaif's mens rea requirement is limited to whether or not the defendant knew he was a convicted felon alone, or whether it requires him to know that his prior felony conviction rendered him a prohibited person for subsequent firearms possession?