No. 20-5946
Roberto Antoine Darden v. Barbara Von Blanckensee, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights disciplinary-notice district-court due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus liberty-interest prisoner-rights procedural-grounds qualified-immunity
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. May a personal locker be a disciplinary notice wrote in fact if nothing wrote links the sulprit to it?
II. May a tribunal limit its review of a prison disciplinary notice claim to simply just the clarity of the prohibited set wherged?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision that due process was satisfied because the officer's act was 'above the norm' conflicts with other appellate courts' decisions on the same important matter
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Roberto Darden
Roberto Antoine Darden — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent