No. 20-5944

In Re Gerald M. Calmese

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights conviction criminal-procedure due-process effective-counsel evidence fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus identity-theft jurisdiction sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Was the Eidere tresrs toblishThe "Anoter Person. in RDiRn Ent of Pantiff which The LAS COnUCED of Lakno thie I 2

2. Ds the cot betore which the Peinif tri have Senisiction ove the offenees ChARGU?

The element of "another person,"in which the plaintiff was convcted of taking their identity

. The court before which the plaintiff was tried lacked jurisdiction over the offenses charged. There for the judgement and sentence of the court is vold.

. The county prosecutor failed to provide the plaintiff with Brody material.

4. The ploiotiff wos denied the 6th Amendment guarantee to effective counsel.

5. The petitioner contends that there is froud cpon the court. And that the county Attorney. the judge and his attorney of record participated in the froud of a vour dwe.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the evidence presented failed to establish the required element of 'another person,' for which the plaintiff was convicted of taking their identity, and whether the court that tried the plaintiff lacked jurisdiction over the offenses charged

Docket Entries

2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-08-20
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Gerald M. Calmese
Gerald M. Calmese — Petitioner