Is leaving allowance for a defendant's Sixth and Federal Constitutional right to due process of law to be violated by denying erroneous instructions at trial, professor Pomeroy to produce a witness ted by were?

Is defendant and/or defense, State and Federal Court decided that do the local due process of law violated equal ill, gave improper care regarding ca missing toile?

Is public's right evidence and process violated because procedural larceny that defendant is state and Federal because of confrontation (u) one but upon Court violation due process of law and computer Aherons why codes of priam the when to product a outages op on if incarcerated Jepwd? (4b/5) and do a once unless burden u proved Outages on ill question or the defense used placed meorceredeji defuciad-ptla

14 on even s dd defense Counsel, patrick o conned fMo.be Series s Prep dvcted the pdfUon.tr by Pooliuc to specitd defcndoub-ptUloatr each oim, procedural prefect-™ oUucS Jepmed the Ud^cUf per,Cr\ey of a reSJ^te likely ClwcZ of GCQviUoJ TM'$o4c<? 5 CuLifcb iso cld dtFej^i Cpufscl (specbr<cU ocosxnell Poul to be prepared For ex Fytf'cd dtPenSC ccLitcJU Qxused (X breed cSuun cd the Qclver$*\r«x/ process bcFuueen cl&F&isd cxacA Pfo^oc^lton FtkdUtoo^ Vielcilton of p-ebtUc/ntrS UAct pedited O>^^ f^l(o/\oi Fhejdr by cUfed tJt Ct^fiF&AcC q£ Cou/]$d Tlu a d'&S hl( &uesl<onQ p^mFtd Uo P'llrlcO'tr (Xj\^cu €rS

Whether the Michigan courts violated the petitioner's state and federal constitutional right to due process of law