No. 20-5933
Junior Griffin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: complete-defense constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process hearsay hearsay-exclusion impeachment-evidence right-to-present-evidence supervisory-power wiretap-evidence wiretapping
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
When Mr. Griffin was denied his right to present critical exculpatory and impeachment evidence through the unpresented remainder of the government's surreptitious recordings, was he also denied his constitutional right to present a complete defense?
Where multiple additional errors affected petitioner's conviction and/or sentence in the courts below, should this Court exercise it's supervisory power to vacate his conviction and sentence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant was denied his constitutional right to present a complete defense
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Junior Griffin
Junior Griffin — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent