Leonard F. Locke, Jr. v. United States
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
/.s fine. Supreme CoorY c/lse \Aud J aIonj wiil) Me /4ppeA/MM
Covrfs cASc Iauj 2c ~hhe d/sfricf Courts cASe UtJ, fAM rS
-from MeSAme c/MricM j- AppallArfP courts , a/o+ Accepted ?
Uhj clic/^'j' tM Appe^JW Coort~ <jfAAfh the it+ifi'oA/tr ,4
CD/] CerffcAfe of dppeA/M/ lity . coktN the CSSOeS Are Me
S/^e /a/ ttur\otj3 cAse. 2r the JeffoA/ers CASc, boh/A "Co/] y
UjA3 cjrAfyted im fiurl ?OCJ 3 CiASQ. .
Idh'j tidbit defense cooA/sel j'm vest dj ate the Uj/ijiiy ot the. sf
gr ArAegt rf fte)etitioA/er OA/ce if coAS ATaJouW there toAs
(AlA-rrA/M, CesultiMj to Mere, beiMj A/OproMb)e c,AuSe to .stop
Merest" Me PefI'fiOAier ?op
A/O
or
Mie. cororJj Icja I
Adoite About Me Good pAith hoctriAie'Ppply/'/oj to Me d/S~
(A'lSSA} of Me Suppression A)otiOAJ / cohtM Mere coAs A/o eoArAA^t
or proof of AejhjANce on ieMlf of AMothe police employee ?
I do Atiy /ai weefyMjOA; /A to Me
f Acts of Yt)e cASe. OAlce CouNst-j cufr5 ihtPormtcf by /eti'troA/er~
of tte Circus Minces of Me Molfple seAret
(My dlM) f defense Coo/viseJ do AA/y /A/t/e$fpj ah / Alto Me
f Acts of ft CASe Moof the cjfii m of 'Me Sme/i of mAr/j oA/vA
osec/ As the meAns to seArot Me Petifi'oA/eri \/e h i c /e Mu/'ce $r
per60A/ ftree tl/neS / to d/sco \Jtr MM Mere
evidence of/Any /A Arno AM A ?(OA/er
k~)Ky g/zc/aD f depejusecoo M-se
y?es :
pfys/tn/ to As A/O
QuespiPreseA/fec/ CeohA-ifiJUaj)0AI5
KMk £jky did de-f^MSe- COUAlSe J Co fierce.
Question not identified