No. 20-5912

Adam Alan Henry v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-2256 constitutional-vagueness criminal-law due-process federal-statute first-amendment overbreadth sexually-explicit-conduct statutory-interpretation vagueness
Latest Conference: 2020-11-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A)(v ) the definition of "sexually
explicit conduct" defined as the lascivious exhibition of the
genitals or pubic area of any person is vague, ambiguous,
overbroad and a violation of due process.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the definition of 'sexually explicit conduct' in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A)(v) is vague, ambiguous, overbroad and a violation of due process

Docket Entries

2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-05
Motion (20M17) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2020-08-19
MOTION (20M17) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-06
Motion (20M17) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2020-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2020)

Attorneys

Adam Alan Henry
Anthony Patrick CapozziLaw Offices of Anthony P. Capozzi, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent