No. 20-5910

Robert Coleman v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-11-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. What Conateude celevank Conduck 2°

Ad. \Nhen does teledant Conduck become Celevant Conduct do dhe inslant S¥Sense oF conuicheon Yo be used to enhaace a genbencas 7

S. When cloes eelevank Conduck become. Nok Relevant, and cannok beused be enhance. dhe thatont oWSence of Convichion ah Senencina t

H Does dhe dime lmdalion belween boo deux ciahebubion Cases (rok aolely on Whether oc nok We relevant Conduck 2

5. Should Wis Cousk ceviark a I3ueae old Case: United haber V Walle Sid U6. ee Caanls for teasens Mot TA MAK Nous Wave become Unconsdidutional dleaded ia (van of Nelson Vv. Colocade, IST Sch. I4qQ Caoin), Whether or wok does Walle vielates the Uniked Shakes Constitution ES\q Amendment Maht to Cue. Process of \avo, Wren Considerins Pelevant Conduck foc Unenacaed Od uncelaked Senses to he used bo enWance, & Final Convickion cob Denbencna «

Question Presented (AI Summary)

What constitutes relevant conduct?

Docket Entries

2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Robert Coleman
Robert Coleman — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent