A. Whether evidence of prior prostitution activity that is inadmissible under Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence to rebut a claim of sex trafficking by force under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 may be admissible to rebut a claim of sex trafficking by fraud under § 1591.

B. Whether Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence limiting evidence of specific instances of conduct to attack or support a witness's character for truthfulness applies to evidence of an alleged victim's lie to investigators during investigation of the very offense being prosecuted.

Whether evidence of prior prostitution activity that is inadmissible under Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence to rebut a claim of sex trafficking by force under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 may be admissible to rebut a claim of sex trafficking by fraud under § 1591