No. 20-5884
Charles Chad Giese v. California
Tags: criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process miranda-rights prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel right-to-defense self-defense self-incrimination
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Did Police Violated Giese's Miranda Rights by Interrogating Him While He was in Custody?
II. By Excluding Evidence of the Decedent's Drug Use, Was Giese Deprived of His Constitutional Right to Present a Defense?
III. Did the Prosecutor Commit Prejudicial Misconduct by Misstating the Law During Closing Argument
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Police Violate Giese's Miranda Rights by Interrogating Him While He was in Custody?
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2020-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2020)
Attorneys
California
Scott Alan Taryle — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Charles Chad Giese
Rose Fay Arfa — Fay Arfa, A Law Corporation, Petitioner