No. 20-5881
Jose Vincente Lira-Ramirez v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process immigration immigration-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect noncitizen-rights notice removal removal-proceedings unlawful-reentry
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Due Process Clause permit a noncitizen to be convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for unlawful reentry into the United States if the noncitizen was removed from the United States by an immigration court that did not have jurisdiction to do so because of a defective notice that did not include the time and place of the removal proceedings?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Due Process Clause permit a noncitizen to be convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for unlawful reentry into the United States if the noncitizen was removed from the United States by an immigration court that did not have jurisdiction to do so because of a defective notice that did not include the time and place of the removal proceedings?
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Jose Lira-Ramirez, et al.
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent