No. 20-5875
Terrence D. Marsh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c 6th-amendment criminal-procedure defense-right evidence firearm-prosecution firearms rosemond-precedent rosemond-v-united-states section-924c sixth-amendment statements-against-interest
Latest Conference:
2020-11-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court violated Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014), when finding Marsh had advance knowledge of the presence of a firearm in his 18 U.S.C. §924(c) prosecution?
Whether the Court undercut Marsh's Sixth Amendment right to present a statements against penal interest?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court violated Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014), when finding Marsh had advance knowledge of the presence of a firearm in his 18 U.S.C. §924(c) prosecution?
Docket Entries
2020-11-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Terrence Marsh
Brian J. Kornbrath — Federal Public Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent