No. 20-5855
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-authority civil-procedure court-procedure due-process judicial-oversight judicial-recusal jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge legal-precedent new-evidence recusal standing
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court committed errors therein arising from oversight
Whether new evidence serves as precedence
Whether the deciding Judges acted with malice by not issuing an order of recusal
Whether a court, which acknowledges a clear "Lack of Jurisdiction" abuses its authority in not remanding to the Jurisdictional Court
Whether the Court committed error in not accepting the Defendant's original defense of "Lack of Jurisdiction" made under oath
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court committed errors therein arising from oversight
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-31
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2020)
Attorneys
In Re Ruben Benitez
Ruben O. Benitez — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent