No. 20-5842

Yang Mei v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2020-09-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: amendment-violation body-attachment city-council civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights contractor-dismissal due-process employment legal-procedure standing takings
Latest Conference: 2021-01-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Violations of Amendments of the Constitution

In this case there are two kinds of violations to the Constitution. One is that the violations action directly indicate which Amendment of the Constitution is violated, there are at least 4 of them of these kinds in my case; Another is that the violations action does not indicate what Amendment of the Constitution is violated, but the result and effect Will show unconstitutional. There are at least 2 of them in this case; Please allow me take "The dismissal of the contractor Adam Barclay is unconstitutional" in this case for example:

Related information:
Action — it does not indicate violation of which Amendment.
The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore , through its attorney, Shea Beitler-Akman,Esq., Special Assistant City Solicitor, respectfully Requests that the body attachment for Adam Barclay, entered October 23, 2012 be vacated." (appendix 3-2, page 26)

Who is Adam Barclay
Adam Barclay was the contractor , having received my payments of $42375.00, Hired by me to do the rehabilitation job, required by Baltimore City Department of Housing , for my home building in the year of 2011, which money was more than two years of our family total yearly income in that year,my children had been suffering hunger during those years for paying the money; the contractor Adam Barclay had promised in District Court three times to finish work,and he did not finish job, he did lots damages to our home building: stripped down all the copper water lines and fixtures in good working condition and the whole building big sewerage copper lines that still in good working condition , for money, and a 8x12 in good working condition walk-in refrigerator was torn down for motors and copper lines for money, and three freezers and one show- and-display refrigerator got the same fate of the motors and copper lines , selling for money, even two gutters could not escaped, then depriving the restaurant at the first floor of all equipment and fixtures that were in good working condition, to the floor, got everything out that can sell for money,and then disappeared; (these damages became this case evidence of "public nuisance" and "vacant building" for auction —it is a disaster by men made after a disaster by God), then he was added as a defendant ,a bench warrant was issued...was never arrested... A defendant fleeing from a bench warrant , then got dismissed.

Result — showing unfair for the homeowner. Violation.
The appellant landed into fighting for his citizens justness and equality of Constitution rights in courts, for the unreasonable seizure Of my home property, for my children's housing, from the Baltimore City Department of Housing, for housing against auction .

Effect — showing unfair for the public. Violation.
Bad contractors will follow suit, get money and run; good contractors good credit in doubt, business Jeopardized; How about fleeing from warrant? Creating more bad guys trying to follow suit. This is not a good precedent.

It is unconstitutional. This is only one example,more in writ of certiorari.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the dismissal of the contractor Adam Barclay is unconstitutional

Docket Entries

2021-01-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-11-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent Mayor and City Counsel Baltimore to respond filed.
2020-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2020)

Attorneys

Mayor and City Counsel Baltimore
Michael Patrick RedmondBaltimore City Law Department, Respondent
Yang Mei
Yang Mei — Petitioner