Jose Rufino Garcia-Chicol v. Arkansas
i) Should the Second plus Guarantees Protections of 1 Foreign Civilized Under the Freches, Constituted, and States of the United States of America in the state of Arkansas be allowed 4 be Jotaled in Criminal Legal Procedures by the state affects the Fundamental Larvedess exercised there
a) should a Foreign Hehoral ishe does po k Speak or ubeastad the English Ladguase be Subjected Jo Carruint Pascale covfhoot the kiowledse of, noe Represettatiod Grom fhere kome Nation !
3) should only dhol lest monty pus Evidedce Pacsesbid Ihe Eapish Laug unge bE Cousideadd by the Jray Soa fhe Poepose of Delibeentod pw Cases wrth Lorergn Walaa Ghzeds as Pelesbeut?
ili
4) Al chal Powt has meee allesehewe become Evouch Sade 4 Suggoe n dean of lle 5. . Jmpriserlmrent Witheot any Suppeeliag Physical Endeuce oa Cadtessiod?
6) should a Pprpedly Presested motu Gre Pinecled Verde hased on idsallreceney of dhe Gudenke fe Devied asa Resslt of dhe oppmbaiom Comemet, aud Disdend Loa the neler allesalods Ceenled by | the ilu ewee of anys Media on she Wdicinay | avd Paliheg ? ,
©) Can av Ziwrdvals Due Process Right, especially A Soret Chie, b spenk add be henad od there owl behalf ol Tare be Comporused by the Taal Covak Toshi, them Thaoush them desk mosy dhe niteaest Exped has qhe PO CEES 1eh5, 8 Soa. dhe Covewence of theTeel Corel aud Joey ?
twhal value Dees the Life of n Foasied Neti ab have ?
Whether the Second Amendment's protections of a 'well-regulated Militia' under the Framers, Constitution, and Statutes of the United States of America in the state of Arkansas should be allowed to be violated in criminal judicial proceedings by the state