Should the Maryland Court of Appeals, acting by and through its Attorney Grievance Commission, have granted Petitioner's request for a hearing on her Petition for Writ of Mandamus, to present her constitutional due process and equal protection challenges, including: (1) the complainant in this attorney disciplinary case admitted that he had no evidence to support his allegations; (2) confidential information of the investigation was improperly disclosed to an unrelated pro bono client; allowing that client to file a complaint; (3) the assigned trial judge for the disciplinary case, Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge, the Honorable Jeffery M. Geller, had been the trial Judge for another unrelated pro bono client of this Petitioner and (4) permitted the participation of Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge, the Honorable Lawrence V. Fletecher-Hill, who is currently presiding and ruling in another unrelated pro bono client of this Petitioner?

Should the Maryland Court of Appeals have granted Petitioner's request for a hearing on her Petition for Writ of Mandamus